U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to BAPCPA
Challenges to the application of certain provisions of the 2005 Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act began the very day the law took effect. One of the first to bring suit to have the law declared unconstitutional was the law firm of Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz. Now, nearly four years later, the United States Supreme Court has agreed to decide the Constitutionality of language prohibiting attorneys from advising clients to take on debt in advance of a bankruptcy filing.
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals decided last year that the legislature had intended to include paid bankruptcy attorneys in the definition of "debt relief agency", and that the 526(a)(4) restrictions were overly broad as applied to bankruptcy attorneys. The court ruled, however, that the section 528 disclosure requirements passed the rational basis test.
For more on the history of the Milavetz case: